Oncology
professionals are concerned about the ability of their patients to access
cancer screening and treatment under the American Health Care Act proposed by
House Speaker Paul Ryan, according to a survey conducted in March at the
National Comprehensive Cancer Network’s Annual Conference.
A
majority of those surveyed believed that anticipated changes to the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) would have a negative impact on
their practices and on cancer research. More than 70 percent noted that
patients have voiced concern about the anticipated repeal and replacement of
Obamacare, nearly two-thirds of whom have demonstrated increased levels of
distress.
The
survey was conducted during the period of congressional debate over the
American Health Care Act (AHCA), which was withdrawn the afternoon of March 24
when it became clear there were not enough votes to pass the legislation. Responding
to the survey were 76 oncology professionals, including physicians, academic
and community; nurses; physician assistants; pharmacists; industry
professionals; payers and patient advocates. Republicans in the House continue
to discuss ways to repeal or change the law.
“The
American Health Care Act is tabled and the ACA remains in place, but concerns
about access to cancer screening, care, and research funding remain. Today,
patients are in limbo, not knowing what action the federal and state
governments will take,” said Robert W. Carlson, MD, Chief Executive Officer of
NCCN. “NCCN agrees there are ways to improve the current health care system for
Americans with cancer, the clinical professionals who care for them, and
payers. However, we are concerned for Americans with cancer that affordability,
coverage of products and services in cancer treatment, and overall access will
be impeded by allowing health insurers to set their own rates, or by providing
states the ability to experiment with Medicaid coverage, without appropriate
patient protections.”
The
NCCN survey found:
•
Fifty-five percent of respondents
reported that the anticipated large-scale changes to federal health care policy
would likely have a negative impact on their practice, research programs or
patient outcomes. Eleven percent anticipated a positive impact, and 34 percent
anticipated a neutral, or mixed impact.
•
When asked to select from a list
of outcomes they anticipated would occur with changes to health care policy,
those who anticipated a negative impact (55%) indicated:
• Fewer patients will have access to health insurance (71%) • High deductibles will limit patient access to care (69%) • Cancer screening rates will decline due to higher co-pays and deductibles (63%) • Patients’ pre-existing conditions could be excluded from coverage (57%) • Federal funding for cancer research will decline (56%) • There will be less support for mental health services (50%)
Those who expected a positive impact (11%) indicated:
• With increased competition for insurers operating across state lines, health insurance premiums and co-pays will go down for more patients, leading to improved access to care (50%) • Allowing medications to be imported will create more competition and reduced drug prices (50%) • Patient health savings accounts will lead to increased price transparency for medical procedures and medications, causing health care costs to drop (38%)
•
When asked, “What kind of impact
do you believe changes in federal health care policy will have on your
patients’ ability to afford cancer care?” 66 percent of respondents said the
impact would be negative; nine percent said positive; and 25 percent said the
impact would be neutral.
•
And, to the question, “To your knowledge, are your patients
affected by health insurance policy and the possible repeal and replacement of
the Affordable Care Act?” respondents answered:
• Yes, patients have expressed concern and demonstrated greater levels of distress (50%) • Yes, patients have expressed concern but no evidence of health impact (21%) • No, I have not seen any effects (29%)
“President Trump included three key elements in his approach
to health coverage reform: repairing necessary aspects of the ACA, ensuring
greater access, and lowering the total cost of care,” Dr. Carlson said. “We are
ready to share our Network’s expertise with lawmakers to deliver a value-based
health policy to ensure that all Americans with cancer have access to
high-quality, effective, and efficient cancer care.”
Read
Dr. Carlson’s March
21, 2017 letter to Congress outlining NCCN’s concerns about the health
policy proposal and patient access to care here.
Information from a news release provided by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.
Information from a news release provided by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.
No comments:
Post a Comment